I believe categorizing people into “us” and “them” is a
natural human instinct, but racism is not. Racism was created. When my children
have asked me where it came from, I have always told them that slavery caused
racism. In scale and brutality, American slavery was unlike anything the world
had seen. But European slave traders and American planters still had to look at themselves in the mirror every day. Because they couldn’t bear to face the evilness of their own actions, they created the myth of racial superiority to justify
their actions.
If something was created, that means there was a time before
it existed. That’s kind of an obvious point, but I had never really thought
about the time before American racism existed and about how it was brought into being.
Recently I’ve been reading a lot about that time. It’s a very specific time and
place – a few decades beginning in 1620 in the English colonies of Virginia and
Maryland. I’m learning about the very first time the word “white” was used in
law in North America to describe a group of people – in Maryland in 1681.
Before there were “white” people, there were English, Irish,
Africans, and Indians; “civilized” people and “savages”; Christians and
“heathens”; free people, tenants, and bonded laborers. These were all
categories of “us” and “them” and it cannot be overstated how much life SUCKED
for almost everyone. A few English landowners grew rich and everyone else
struggled to survive and often didn’t. I
am not romanticizing this as an egalitarian society. But in the time before
racism, the categories were different, and an Irish bonded laborer aligned
himself with an African bonded laborer, not with an English landowner. Before
the creation of “white” people, Africans and Europeans in Virginia and Maryland
shared experiences of servitude and land ownership, married each other, voted
at similar rates, and were treated similarly (mostly poorly) by the law.
During Bacon’s Rebellion in 1676, European and African
laborers united against the ruling class (to hasten the theft of native land -
again, not romanticizing). To prevent these kinds of rebellions from
continuing, the English elite made a conscious
and deliberate decision to create
the category of “white” and the myth of white racial superiority. It is this consciousness
and deliberateness that is new information to me. In the mid and late 17th century, the colonial assemblies of Virginia and Maryland passed law after law
establishing different treatment for Europeans and Africans in owning bond
laborers, manumission, owning livestock, marriage, holding public office,
voting, serving in militias, owning weapons, and punishments for
transgressions. They then required parish clerks to read these laws aloud in
church once every spring and fall, and sheriffs to read them aloud in
courthouses during the June or July terms of court. Historian Theodore Allen
writes, “We must conclude that the general public was regularly and
systematically subjected to official white-supremacist agitation. It was to be
drummed into the minds of the people… thus was the ‘white race’ invented.”
I realize, as I learn this history, that I have participated
in a “great forgetting.” Even though I knew race was an invented social
category and I could put the creation of racism into its historical context for
my children, somehow I had never thought about the details. Realizing this
makes me feel horrified at how successful the myth of white supremacy has been.
But it also makes me slightly hopeful. If many of us have forgotten, maybe we
can collectively try to remember. Life in the English colonies in the mid 17th century was brutal and oppressive, but “white” and “black” people lived and
worked and resisted together with little awareness of our current racial divisions.
That image, that knowledge that it happened, helps me visualize a world where
it will happen again.